![Image of Lake Powell](/sites/default/files/styles/full_width_1024px_5_3_/public/2024-08/Lake%20Powell%205x3.jpg?itok=Yg03xFPo)
![Image of Lake Powell](/sites/default/files/styles/full_width_1024px_5_3_/public/2024-08/Lake%20Powell%205x3.jpg?itok=Yg03xFPo)
The strategist’s challenge is to simultaneously manage three critical factors: values, opportunities and capabilities. In order to devise and execute a successful strategy, you need to analyze each of these factors to understand how your organization can create and sustain value. The various tools summarized in The Strategist’s Toolkit can help to paint a complete picture of your organization’s competitive landscape.
Values refer to the mission of the organization. Understanding and establishing your organizational values is a critical first step in devising a successful business strategy and understanding how you can create value for others. Your values define your ambitions and the competitive space in which you operate. Your values help delineate what you will and will not do to achieve your mission. To better define your organization’s values, you might consider and answer these questions:
Considering these questions will help you begin to identify competitive positions that create value for stakeholders. After all, strategy formulation is not done on a blank slate. Your mission and values define your opportunity set and help you understand how to leverage and build your capabilities.
Bill Gates of Microsoft set out to create the world’s greatest software company. That simple statement defined Microsoft’s aspirations and the scope in which it operates. Google says they will “do no evil,” declaring a value set that constrains and enables specific strategic actions. Conducting a Stakeholder Analysis can be very useful in understanding what others expect of you and may be influential in helping to define your own values for the organization. Ultimately, your values serve as boundary conditions for your strategy.
Opportunities refer to the possible competitive positions in the market to create value for stakeholders. To define them, you could take the following steps:
You need to think clearly about the economic, technological and societal environment in which your organization operates and acutely consider the activities and capabilities of your competitors. Each of the three tasks identified above requires attention and analysis. Defining your industry and competitors is deceptively simple, but it can be greatly informed by a full competitor analysis, environmental analysis, five forces analysis, and competitive life-cycle analysis.
Capabilities refer to the organization’s existing and potential strengths. These ideally fuel the organization’s strategic efforts. To evaluate an organization’s strategy, you need both a clear picture of what makes the organization distinctive and a sense of the organization’s ability to marshal resources and leverage capabilities toward desired organizational objectives. This requires, of course, clarity about those capabilities:
Tackling these questions can be informed by an extensive capability analysis. A capability analysis can help you identify sources of competitive advantage and highlight critical gaps in your current capabilities. Other tools such as strategy maps can be useful in highlighting your position versus rivals and to answer whether your capabilities are unique.
These three factors converge in the organization’s competitive position, where value for an organization’s stakeholders is created and sustained. Ultimately, developing effective business strategy is an integrative exercise. It involves looking through a wide lens at the organization. Whereas the functional areas of an organization — finance, marketing, accounting, operations, human resources — often bring specific paradigmatic views to bear on organizational problems and considerations, business strategy is about how all the underlying insights of these disciplines are brought together. Managers do not typically encounter challenges as isolated, atomistic problems with narrow disciplinary implications; rather, they must navigate issues that encompass a whole range of complex, cross-disciplinary considerations.
Business strategy is also integrative because its success involves value creation for its investors, employees, customers, suppliers and support communities. Commonly invoked business axioms like “maximize shareholder returns” can be useful to the extent that such shorthand phrases imply value creation for investors by way of creating value for all key stakeholders — creating goods customers want, work environments that energize employee contributions and so forth. Maximizing shareholder value is not a strategic direction, nor is it exogenous to creating value for customers, employees or communities. Strategy involves putting these considerations together to align stakeholder interests and create value in an integrative and sustainable way.
Use an integrative, enterprise perspective to think clearly and to exercise sound judgment that creates long-lasting value. When successfully implemented, an effective business strategy can help an organization fully realize its potential.
Darden Professors Jared Harris and Mike Lenox are authors of the book The Strategist’s Toolkit (Darden Business Publishing).
Harris is an expert on both ethics and strategic management. His research centers on the interplay between ethics and strategy, with a particular focus on the topics of corporate governance, business ethics and interorganizational trust. Harris has written extensively on the topics of executive compensation and other governance-related topics.
Harris worked as a certified public accountant and consultant for several leading public accounting firms in Boston and Portland, Oregon, and served as the CFO of a small technology firm in Washington, D.C. He consults with several top financial services companies on the topics of strategic management, ethics and compliance.
He recently published The Strategist’s Toolkit, a primer on strategic thinking, with Darden Professor Mike Lenox. He also co-authored the recently published paper “Model-Theoretic Knowledge Accumulation: The Case of Agency Theory and Incentive Alignment” in the Academy of Management Review and a forthcoming paper titled “A Comparison of Alternative Measures of Organizational Aspirations” for the Strategic Management Journal.
B.S., M.Acc., Brigham Young University; Ph.D., University of Minnesota
Lenox’s expertise is in the domain of technology strategy and policy. He studies the role of innovation in helping a business succeed. In particular, he explores the sourcing of external knowledge by firms and this practice’s impact on a company’s innovation strategy. Lenox has a longstanding interest in the interface between business strategy and public policy as it relates to the natural environment; his work explores firm strategies and nontraditional public policies that have the potential to drive green innovation and entrepreneurship.
In 2013, Lenox co-authored The Strategist’s Toolkit with Darden Professor Jared Harris. His latest book,
Lenox is a prolific author; his most recent book, Strategy in the Digital Age: Mastering Digital Transformation, examines how digital technologies and services enable the creation of innovative products and services, as well as identifying new competitive positions.
B.S., M.S., University of Virginia; Ph.D., Massachusetts Institute of Technology